cpanoob.blogg.se

Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017
Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017







sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017
  1. #Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 license key
  2. #Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 install
  3. #Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 Pc

Or we want to be able to switch between machines without a Medusa's tangle of cables. Some of you may remember those round green and purple mouse and keyboard connectors from back in the day.īut sometimes we want to share one monitor (in this case, our TV).

#Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 Pc

Fun fact: Back in the day, I bought a giant, multi-thousand dollar KVM (about the size of a PC tower on its side) for work that connected 16 computers to one monitor, keyboard, and mouse - using IBM PS/2-style connectors. The acronym KVM means Keyboard/Video/Mouse and the purpose of a KVM switch is to connect multiple computers to one set of peripherals. Many of ZDNet's readers are IT pros, so many of you will be familiar with KVM switches. When you have to produce as much work output as I do each year, optimizing becomes mission-critical just to get it all done.Īll that brings me back to the three computers in our living room and Logitech's Easy Switch technology. One of the most important is that the more optimized your space is, the more productivity improves. My work at home environment has changed a lot over the years, and I've learned many lessons. But when we bought our house a year or so ago, we chose it knowing it had to provide work at home space.Īnd yet, here I am, typing away on the couch, in our living room. I spent most of 20 working out of a kitchen using a $50 desk. So, it's important for me to acknowledge how lucky I am to be able to work from home, and especially in pandemic times where many folks can't work at home or work at all, that I have a highly optimized and comfortable work at home space. Look, I know right about now, a bunch of you have just about reached the "it must be nice" stage of this discussion. We are also not drawn to our La-Z-Boy reclining couch. Another is hooked up to a monitor mounted on an Ergotron arm that rotates out and serves as my primary development machine. you can get that, but for the most part I use Linux as a server host and not a lot of GUI apps.ĭrag and drop of files from windows to osx and back works, as does cut an paste of files.We have three Mac minis in here. It doesn't support Linux (sad) but Linux supports RDP so well these days if you need a desktop for a Linux server OS.

#Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 install

You can install sharemouse everywhere, only one device needs to hold a license, and only those nodes sharing a password can connect to each other.

#Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017 license key

One of the coolest things is you can "donglize it" by putting your license key on a portable flash drive and there by "move" it from home to office and back and forth. It is a lan solution, its not webtop sharing solution.īut it will also protect traffic with a shared password. The licensing seems fair, free is two node and two monitor, standard includes additional nodes and features, professional offers the most nodes and unlimited attached monitors. Its put out by the same people who offer MaxiVista, which is an IP monitor sharing tool for presentations and extending a desktop. With a cut an paste buffer and cut and paste file transfer ability. Sharemouse is a local lan KVM solution for sharing multiple keyboards and mice between multiple attached monitors. I've got nothing against opensource and sharing ideas, but a polished product is worth money, and one that has a road map and delivers on that roadmap, deserves a customer. I'm a big user of InputDirector, use to use Synergy.









Sharemouse vs. synergy for mac 2017